NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
▲Why Gopher in 2026? (gopher.muffinlabs.com)
prologic 4 hours ago [-]
I still think Gopher (the protocol that is) is still very relevant today. The beauty of it really is in its simplicity. Great to see that the library I wrote all those years ago is still being used :D

https://pkg.go.dev/git.mills.io/prologic/go-gopher

ecliptik 23 minutes ago [-]
Few months ago I had Claude build me a Gopher browser for Classic Macintosh systems, geomys[1]. I was using TurboGopher[2] before then, and it worked, but had a lot of design choices that are clunky today.

I tried to focus on keeping with the Apple HIG from the 1990s, while also making it more aligned with modern browser principles.

1. https://github.com/ecliptik/geomys

2. https://www.macintoshrepository.org/265-turbogopher

II2II 3 hours ago [-]
I love the idea of Gopher (even more so of Gemini), but the basic hurdle I run into is content. It feels like half of it is talking about how great gopher/gemini is, and the other half are deeply personal blogs. While the technology reflects the early days of the Internet, the content reflects the early days of blogging and social media (which came later). Rather than talking about things they are passionate about, they are talking about themselves.
post-it 20 minutes ago [-]
I feel the same about Gander (the Canadian Bluesky-compatible startup). The only content on it is people talking about how it's not Twitter. One of my top three beefs with it.
Vaushite 15 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
warkdarrior 3 hours ago [-]
Maybe they are passionate about themselves??
anthk 2 hours ago [-]
gopher://sdf.org and gopher://magical.fish have far more than retro-onanism.
hujun236 2 hours ago [-]
The content split is what keeps me from staying. Once you leave the two or three hosts everyone names, it is hard to tell a technical phlog from another post about the protocol itself. Do you keep a short list of non-meta phlogs, or is it mostly hopping between known hosts?
vaporup 4 hours ago [-]
anthk 4 hours ago [-]
Gemini it's good on legacy machines and some clients can be really barebones (awk+less), and for some security there are clients written in Go. For awk+less, do yourself a favour. Run

    unset LESSOPEN 
or have it at ~/.profile.

Reticulum it's unusable in 32 bit machines, it badly needs a Go port for nomadnet.

On Gopher, well, lynx/sacc and maybe i2pd for some security and anonimity.

As a start, there's:

     gopher://magical.fish
     gopher://sdf.org
For gemini,

     gemini://gemi.dev it's nice.
'Lagrange' covers both gemini and gopher as a client.

You can set an HTTPS proxy for it and read news sites and blogs over Gemini.

Just set

     stargate.gemi.dev:1994
As the HTTP proxy in the settings for Lagrange.

For the terminal guys, there's Telescope and it can use HTTP proxies as well. Read the man page.

billyhoffman 47 minutes ago [-]
I run gemi.dev, so it was nice to see it here.

I recently built a Gemini client for people who like GUI's more than TUI's, and want a native macOS app

https://github.com/acidus99/MajorTom

jmclnx 3 hours ago [-]
Why ? It is not owned and controlled by billionaires. Plus no AI slop being spammed to gopher sites.

FWIW, the same applies to gemini protocol.

cowlevel 3 hours ago [-]
Same applies to HTTP too though
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 04:15:46 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.