Suspiciously large number of comments flooding in to discredit this starting at the same time.
ChrisArchitect 26 minutes ago [-]
Are they forbidden from titling this German AfD document leak or something? Why non-specific mentions of what this is on the About page etc?
tonymet 9 minutes ago [-]
My guess would be libel / defamation laws in Germany , since they don't have free speech protections like the USA
tonymet 1 hours ago [-]
AI summary:
"AfD member xxx writes and forwards racist dehumanizing incitement:.
Source:
(source text not published for this record)
retrac 1 hours ago [-]
They assert the full text is available in the torrent archive. I have not verified this: https://hexane.cc/verify/
tonymet 46 minutes ago [-]
why redact?
tonymet 45 minutes ago [-]
from their site
> Rendering them as individual pages would mean publishing an indexed, searchable copy of every private message in the corpus — including the many that concern ordinary members and people who wrote to the party, not public figures.
Besides the practical hassle of downloading 300gb and wasting time .
It's their report, their claims, their argument. The burden to make the case and be transparent is theirs, not mine. It's dishonest to present AI summaries as facts.
There should be at least a sample of the source text so we can see how well the descriptions match the sources.
Also, where is the prompt, the model? The methods used to present the content.
It's funny how much critique of "AI slop" is on HN, and here's a case where even mild hallucination is very misleading, yet the bar is incredibly low.
stop50 16 minutes ago [-]
There is a second magnet which features all the 100k file as individual files. The packed archive is only for more efficient torrents
roosterIllusi0n 14 minutes ago [-]
If you are bothered by not knowing, why aren't you downloading it and looking?
ofjcihen 15 minutes ago [-]
“Here’s the files so you can look for yourself”
“I refuse to and I’m still going to complain.”
1 hours ago [-]
caidan 1 hours ago [-]
Now this is an excellent use of AI!
kylepomykala 33 minutes ago [-]
Interesting.
Website screams AI slop though.
26 minutes ago [-]
anon84873628 20 minutes ago [-]
The website seems perfectly clear and functional.
josefritzishere 60 minutes ago [-]
Afd are just the Nazi party all over again. To quote the Wikipedia entry "In 2017, ten AfD Bundestag members were found to have participated in a closed Facebook group named "the Patriots" in which, among other things, antisemitic, racist, pro-Nazi and conspiratorial posts were widespread."
sajithdilshan 26 minutes ago [-]
[flagged]
xvxvx 1 hours ago [-]
Imagine going back in time to tell Hitler that, in 80 years, the German far-right would be led by a publicly pro-Jewish lesbian. Hell… maybe someone did, and that’s why he shot himself.
I think that "let's not attach each other" and "supporting" aren't the same thing.
TFNA 19 minutes ago [-]
The pact included industrial cooperation and dividing up foreign conquests. To simply quote Wikipedia:
"In August of that year [1939], the countries expanded their economic relationship by entering into a Trade and Credit agreement whereby the Soviet Union sent critical raw materials to Germany in exchange for weapons, military technology and civilian machinery. That deal accompanied the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, which contained secret protocols dividing central Europe between them, after which both Nazi forces and Soviet forces invaded territories listed within their 'spheres of influence'."
JumpCrisscross 20 minutes ago [-]
They’re not. But the Nazis hating minorities within their own borders doesn’t delineate them.
mulderc 1 hours ago [-]
Should probably add that her grandfather was a member of the SS
red_candle_wax 1 hours ago [-]
Not quite the same, but I believe something like this happens in "Look Who's Back"
1 hours ago [-]
jjtheblunt 24 minutes ago [-]
Hitler was a National Socialist (Nazi).
If that phrase were evaluated in the US in 2026, would that be "far left"?
I ask because it seems these phrases and coordinate systems are just an inconsistent clickbait mess.
stop50 13 minutes ago [-]
The socialism part was fake. The named it so because socialism was popular and the promises are hard to distinguish from some right wing parties. In the past jews were the main enemy, now its muslims.
Grimeton 16 minutes ago [-]
Naa, far left are the international socialists.
thomastjeffery 17 minutes ago [-]
National Socialist was a lie at the time. The meaning of socialism has not changed. Labels are assertions, not prescriptions. The inconsistency is truth, not ideology.
guywithahat 36 minutes ago [-]
It feels to me we should be using quotations for the term "far-right", it has the same feel to me as Republicans calling Obama a socialist when he was still president.
goodpoint 12 minutes ago [-]
Yes, they are proper nazi.
exe34 26 minutes ago [-]
I think ethnic cleansing for a national renewal is pretty far right, no? The next stop is gas chambers, I believe.
jjtheblunt 23 minutes ago [-]
those were the national socialists doing that, which in US jargon would be far left.
point is, these phrases and names seem to have different connotations in different times.
_hugerobots_ 17 minutes ago [-]
There is no 'jargon' to compare left and right leaning parties from 80 years ago, to today's versions. To exercise ANY comparison within that context in a serious tone, is to build the most flammable straw man that even laughing at it would set the argument to ashes.
eta: I realize arguing with bots and paid farms is to do a disservice to everyone, but it's just painful to see these bad faith arguments presented as 8th grade reading level trick-questions. That said, fucking vote. It's your democratic responsibility in society that is based on social governance.
Rendered at 22:06:10 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
> Rendering them as individual pages would mean publishing an indexed, searchable copy of every private message in the corpus — including the many that concern ordinary members and people who wrote to the party, not public figures.
which is suspicious
It's their report, their claims, their argument. The burden to make the case and be transparent is theirs, not mine. It's dishonest to present AI summaries as facts.
There should be at least a sample of the source text so we can see how well the descriptions match the sources.
Also, where is the prompt, the model? The methods used to present the content.
It's funny how much critique of "AI slop" is on HN, and here's a case where even mild hallucination is very misleading, yet the bar is incredibly low.
“I refuse to and I’m still going to complain.”
Website screams AI slop though.
That’s old news [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pac...
"In August of that year [1939], the countries expanded their economic relationship by entering into a Trade and Credit agreement whereby the Soviet Union sent critical raw materials to Germany in exchange for weapons, military technology and civilian machinery. That deal accompanied the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, which contained secret protocols dividing central Europe between them, after which both Nazi forces and Soviet forces invaded territories listed within their 'spheres of influence'."
If that phrase were evaluated in the US in 2026, would that be "far left"?
I ask because it seems these phrases and coordinate systems are just an inconsistent clickbait mess.
point is, these phrases and names seem to have different connotations in different times.
eta: I realize arguing with bots and paid farms is to do a disservice to everyone, but it's just painful to see these bad faith arguments presented as 8th grade reading level trick-questions. That said, fucking vote. It's your democratic responsibility in society that is based on social governance.