> In a class I taught at Berkeley, I did an experiment where I wrote a simple little program that would let people type either “f” or “d” and would predict which key they were going to push next. It’s actually very easy to write a program that will make the right prediction about 70% of the time. Most people don’t really know how to type randomly. They’ll have too many alternations and so on. There will be all sorts of patterns, so you just have to build some sort of probabilistic model. Even a very crude one will do well. I couldn’t even beat my own program, knowing exactly how it worked. I challenged people to try this and the program was getting between 70% and 80% prediction rates. Then, we found one student that the program predicted exactly 50% of the time. We asked him what his secret was and he responded that he “just used his free will.”
pavel_lishin 52 minutes ago [-]
Is anyone sufficiently paranoid that their first thought was, "Are you going to train a model on my voice?"
(Yes, I saw the "type the numbers" option.)
AnthonBerg 8 minutes ago [-]
Ah, you see they are doing something far more random…
_diyar 14 minutes ago [-]
Why would they when there are thousands of hours of radio and podcasts do train on?
progforlyfe 39 minutes ago [-]
Yes, my mind went directly here
vorticalbox 5 minutes ago [-]
I got to 2/30 then it just guessed 7 from 30-50.
Did I break it?
alwa 22 minutes ago [-]
I found it interesting when I felt my focus shift from the number-generating task to noticing (and responding to) the house’s guesses.
As soon as I noticed it repeating its guess, I had a good long run of adversarially avoiding that number… it’s kind of fun being on the machine side of the slot-machine-type racket!
foxhop 9 minutes ago [-]
blobrand dot com
Rendered at 18:25:42 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
> In a class I taught at Berkeley, I did an experiment where I wrote a simple little program that would let people type either “f” or “d” and would predict which key they were going to push next. It’s actually very easy to write a program that will make the right prediction about 70% of the time. Most people don’t really know how to type randomly. They’ll have too many alternations and so on. There will be all sorts of patterns, so you just have to build some sort of probabilistic model. Even a very crude one will do well. I couldn’t even beat my own program, knowing exactly how it worked. I challenged people to try this and the program was getting between 70% and 80% prediction rates. Then, we found one student that the program predicted exactly 50% of the time. We asked him what his secret was and he responded that he “just used his free will.”
(Yes, I saw the "type the numbers" option.)
Did I break it?
As soon as I noticed it repeating its guess, I had a good long run of adversarially avoiding that number… it’s kind of fun being on the machine side of the slot-machine-type racket!