> Typically, in order to observe nonlinear phenomena, an intensity of the electromagnetic field of light larger than 108 V/m (and thus comparable to the atomic electric field of ~1011 V/m) is required.
I don’t know anything about this field. Can you address this point? How close are we to overcoming this in academia?
amelius 16 minutes ago [-]
10^8 V/m, yeah that is quite a lot, 100V per micron or 1MV/cm. Even if it works it's going to have reliability issues, especially since the structures are not going to be perfect.
Y_Y 1 hours ago [-]
At milliwatt power, and terahertz frequency?
PowerElectronix 57 minutes ago [-]
I guess it's a theoretical limit as in the material can change properties that fast given a fast light signal.
amelius 1 hours ago [-]
I mean, researchers have been trying for years, what is different now?
octoberfranklin 3 hours ago [-]
Yes; this material is called "snake oil".
amelius 3 hours ago [-]
Let's see if the investors bite.
wartywhoa23 2 hours ago [-]
Theranos demonstrated that they'll bite at anything.
jurschreuder 2 hours ago [-]
It's just as if he had the brilliant idea to do photonics as an outcast even though there is already a 6" wafer semi-production level fablab being built for it in The Netherlands. There is even a version of TinyTapeout for Photonics.
Y_Y 1 hours ago [-]
What's this photonic Tiny Tapeout?
1e1a 1 hours ago [-]
Finally! This paves the way towards practical BrainF*** execution.
9dev 10 minutes ago [-]
We're all adults here, you can spell out BrainFuck just fine.
himata4113 2 hours ago [-]
This comes up every couple of years, but it hasn't seem to have made any advances since the first time I've seen this.
akifbayram 2 hours ago [-]
The channel's other uploads may be giving us a glimpse into this project's future.
JoshTriplett 2 hours ago [-]
Yup. UFO conspiracies, aliens on the moon, PSI...
georgeburdell 41 minutes ago [-]
I didn’t read but I’d also like to point out photonics are 1000x larger than leading edge electronics with minimal path to scaling smaller. I don’t see a free lunch
userbinator 19 minutes ago [-]
Basically the density of early CPUs (1970s), but 1000x faster than those, or current CPUs? Like a 1GHz 6502, or a 1THz 6502? The former is not really better, but the latter might interesting.
gchamonlive 32 minutes ago [-]
There ain't no free lunch, but real progress rarely depend on it. It's usually lunch we weren't eating before, or a different way to eat the same lunch but with much more satisfaction.
12ah5kl 4 hours ago [-]
Interesting topic, unreadable due to sloppification.
flecomet 39 minutes ago [-]
"The first thing to understand about Akhetonics’ optical computer is that it’s not one thing yet." Great, that is such a good explanation. Thanks ChatGPT I guess.
yuhmahp 3 hours ago [-]
Now it's a good case to use your own ai to un-sloppify
dvh 3 hours ago [-]
> Photonics
So also 1000x smaller integration
amelius 3 hours ago [-]
Why?
dvh 27 minutes ago [-]
Light is hundreds of nanometers, smallest "transistor" cannot be much smaller than wavelength.
Y_Y 1 hours ago [-]
In honour of Akhenaten? Cool.
nekusar 23 minutes ago [-]
References of Akhenaten is making rounds in modern pagan/occult circles as well. The "Law of One" group is really pushing ancient Egyptian 'pyramid power' stuff.
natas 3 hours ago [-]
This has been tried by Cray like 15 years ago and the university of Colorado 11 years ago; there were also other initiatives, all failed.
I'm not excluding that now we have more budget/time/AI to make it work (if it can), I'd just say exercise caution reading this (very AI slop) article (and anything that looks too good to be true)
mbfg 4 hours ago [-]
interesting that it is still 2 bit
kmoser 1 hours ago [-]
Do you mean as opposed to operating in an analog fashion? My guess is because keeping it digital means it is as close a possible to a drop-in replacement for today's electronic digital computers, including all the firmware, OS, and software that has already been written for them.
spwa4 15 minutes ago [-]
If you're looking for the limits of this approach: it's about 1000x faster than electric BUT the individual components have to be way larger (and can't be shrinked down)
... which hopefully means a LOT of fabs will be able to produce these (because a 2nm node makes no sense for this)
It also means this will be incredible for radio chips, interconnects, that sort of thing and will do exactly nothing for the first 20 years for cpu's, never mind gpus.
metalman 2 hours ago [-]
akhetonics-photonic-computing 1000x-faster-cpus, in mice
peter_d_sherman 3 days ago [-]
[dead]
Lucasoato 3 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
Rendered at 21:46:27 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Sounds incredible, as in: can't believe it.
By the way, isn't Nvidia researching this?
Very real stuff (I have a PhD on this)
> Typically, in order to observe nonlinear phenomena, an intensity of the electromagnetic field of light larger than 108 V/m (and thus comparable to the atomic electric field of ~1011 V/m) is required.
I don’t know anything about this field. Can you address this point? How close are we to overcoming this in academia?
So also 1000x smaller integration
I'm not excluding that now we have more budget/time/AI to make it work (if it can), I'd just say exercise caution reading this (very AI slop) article (and anything that looks too good to be true)
... which hopefully means a LOT of fabs will be able to produce these (because a 2nm node makes no sense for this)
It also means this will be incredible for radio chips, interconnects, that sort of thing and will do exactly nothing for the first 20 years for cpu's, never mind gpus.