Comparison was done in the scope of coderabbit AI code review tool, which sadly makes it practically irrelevant.
My personal experience as a software engineer, and a former security researcher who did manual code audit, is that this code review tool has such poor results that it isn't worth the "noise" and friction it causes developers during C/I code review
stingraycharles 49 seconds ago [-]
Yeah I personally don’t understand the point of AI code review tools all that much, as AI is already generating the code as well. All of these AI code review tools create so much noise, yet don’t catch the really important things.
ramon156 1 hours ago [-]
Both OAI and Anthropic seem to have released a model that is slightly better but cost ~2x the previous iteration. Interesting play
arthurcolle 2 minutes ago [-]
Astra and Sol are the same price when you factor in token efficiency
kzrdude 38 minutes ago [-]
That should be expected based on the scaling laws that we expect; larger models are more intelligent and cost more. Now it's very unfortunately that they don't publish the size of their models.
simianwords 1 hours ago [-]
Interesting comment because it is true that Astra is costlier for the same intelligence tasks as Sol.
But this is not the same for Fable at all.
jens_tlb 2 hours ago [-]
[dead]
GUSTAVOSIS 3 hours ago [-]
Soon in Airuncode.com
Rendered at 07:35:17 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
My personal experience as a software engineer, and a former security researcher who did manual code audit, is that this code review tool has such poor results that it isn't worth the "noise" and friction it causes developers during C/I code review
But this is not the same for Fable at all.