The only way to keep ads off Facebook is to stop using Facebook.
CivBase 16 minutes ago [-]
If you're still using Facebook, it's because you're required to or you're the kind of person who won't be fazed by this.
wkjagt 31 minutes ago [-]
I know this is probably a very naive question, but what is the end goal putting so much effort into getting past ad blockers? Surely, someone with an ad blocker installed is not going to click on their ads and buy the advertised products anyway. I don't really know what I am talking about, but I guess it's all about ad impressions that generate money, but doesn't this strategy end up making less money, because the money that's put into circumventing ad blockers isn't really generating more sales.
It's like a door to door sales person thinking that if only they could find a way to unlock my door I would buy their stuff.
thewebguyd 1 minutes ago [-]
Online advertising is less and less about forcing a pitch to conversion in the moment its viewed. Even if someone with an ad blocker would never click on the ad anyway, repeat "impressions" build implicit trust just through exposure. Six months or even a year from then, when that user is looking for a specific SaaS tool, for example, the brand they saw 40 times already is the one that feels established and safe, and it's more likely to lead to a conversion without ever clicking the original ad.
The second part of putting so much effort into getting past ad blockers is tracking & fingerprinting, especially across devices.
In general, ads work by anchoring a brand name in your memory for when you eventually are looking for said product or service, the goal isn't always to force a conversion on the spot.
nemomarx 2 minutes ago [-]
Do we no longer habitually install an ad block for friends and family? There's gotta be some naive users with an ad blocker that way, or default within brave or whatever
Lammy 20 minutes ago [-]
Ads are for surveillance as much if not more than they are for money
criddell 18 minutes ago [-]
Presumable the ads on Facebook are served by Facebook and they know who you are and what you are doing on Facebook.
darig 12 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
hn_submit 7 minutes ago [-]
I believe tracking and privacy invasions cannot be solved through technological means, it needs to be solved through laws and regulations.
We need to prod our representatives to ban the selling of our private information. Websites themselves can use the information but they're prohibited from selling it to anyone else. Why? Because the data changes hands and borders several times after which we lose all control over it.
SvenL 27 minutes ago [-]
Aren’t ads payed also via „impressions“, like 10k people saw your advertisement so please pay x money?
teshaq 15 minutes ago [-]
Yes, but if a user doesn’t convert the advertiser will see worse performance metrics as cost per click/conversion/install is higher. That isn’t a good long term outcome for the platform, since advertisers can switch their budgets elsewhere (to Google/Youtube)
There’s a delicate balance, more impressions isn’t always a good outcome. Id assume here given the battle against ad blockers that the platforms do believe the aggregate impression mix leads to good performance for advertisers though
11 minutes ago [-]
seattle_spring 16 minutes ago [-]
Partially, yes. Ads are also psychological, and tracked cross-platform. If you see a BMW ad on Facebook, drive by a BMW billboard on the highway, search BMW on Google, and then go buy a BMW, they have ways of fractionally allocating the conversion to the different impressions. It's pretty crazy.
kakacik 10 minutes ago [-]
I go a bit further - if something penetrates firefox + ublock origin combo, I'll go out of my way to make sure I'll never, ever buy such product or service if I can avoid that (not always possible but reasonably frequent).
Its quichotesque effort but the only thing that can move the needle a bit since everybody involved cares only about money here - waiting for some toothless legislation is useless when harm is happening now.
I wrote and shared uBlock Origin filters for Facebook, shared on Reddit and up to a week later they changed the DOM structure bypassed the filters. After some attempts I no longer publish the filters.
amelius 1 hours ago [-]
Maybe a better approach is to convert the page to an image, run OCR over it, use an LLM to remove the ads, present the result to the user.
ImJamal 1 hours ago [-]
How would you comment or watch a video if you did that?
amelius 1 hours ago [-]
You can still do that.
The only thing I'm proposing is to do the filtering on graphical data (what the user actually sees) rather than on the DOM (which can be obfuscated; and which may change every week).
mattrighetti 39 minutes ago [-]
I'm more surprised by the fact that people still use Facebook
skeeter2020 34 minutes ago [-]
remember the amazing show "community"?
Elroy: “I got a job through LinkedIn.”
Annie: “What? That’s crazy! People use LinkedIn?”
Elroy: “No, LinkedIn hired me to help figure out why people don’t use it.”
Capricorn2481 16 minutes ago [-]
That's an underrated season, imo. Keith David is fantastic.
HackerThemAll 16 minutes ago [-]
Those childish comments are so funny. 3 billion people use Facebook regularly, and there are folks that deem themselves superior to all others who claim "I know nobody who uses Facebook". XD
fsuts 22 minutes ago [-]
Facebook and instagram constantly email me trying to entice me to use the app. As I haven’t used it for years.
I think it’s purely to massage their Active Monthly User numbers to show growth.
zuhsetaqi 17 minutes ago [-]
> I think it’s purely to massage their Active Monthly User numbers to show growth.
I don't think so. They want you to use the App because through the they have way more ways to track you.
nothercastle 3 minutes ago [-]
The app is a back door to your phone. It will vacuum all the data of it if allowed.
la_fayette 2 hours ago [-]
ok thanking the team for this work over the years. i hope yt will stay ad-free :-)
conradfr 1 hours ago [-]
Not sure detailing how Facebook demoralized them is the best idea.
mattrighetti 34 minutes ago [-]
Well, uBlock is entirely open source so...
dzonga 2 hours ago [-]
the tragedy is 'mainstreet' runs on Facebook.
not shitter, google but fb. some local business don't even have their own sites but maintain an insta / fb page.
zamadatix 2 hours ago [-]
Shitter? Edit: Ah, I assume you're referring to X (previously Twitter -> shitter taunt)
Finnucane 43 minutes ago [-]
Xitter.
kotaKat 47 minutes ago [-]
the ONLY way my county communicates emergency alerts is facebook. it's absolutely wild. how do I know if I'm in a state of emergency? facebook. :)
MrDrMcCoy 35 minutes ago [-]
Your country has sold your safety to private interests. Demand better from them.
ravetcofx 1 hours ago [-]
It's where the GenX-ers and boomers are at who have money to spend
SV_BubbleTime 55 minutes ago [-]
I love how Facebook has one reputation, an Instagram has another and they often don’t match at all even though we all know it’s the exact fucking service with a different skin and theme.
makerofthings 37 minutes ago [-]
What's with this current trend of grouping GenX with Boomers? I am GenX and the difference between us and Boomers is wild. My GenX friends are on here. Boomers I know are afraid of self-checkout machines.
curt15 20 minutes ago [-]
"What do you do for work?"
"I find ways to defeat adblockers"
iugtmkbdfil834 1 hours ago [-]
It is an interesting experiment. Ads on my network are mostly blocked, but wife did notice a spike on her FB stuff. Now that she knows how nice ( edit: well, not automatically awful ) net is without ads, lets see if accepts the trade off.
bmurphy1976 1 hours ago [-]
All the more reason to block Facebook completely.
dabber21 1 hours ago [-]
Out of spite they should have a block list, blocking every meta related service, disabled by default... for now
vachina 1 hours ago [-]
uBlock hit them where it hurts. Facebook's entire existence hinges on serving ads.
maxwellito 2 hours ago [-]
Hot take: uBlock origin could insert even MORE ads into Facebook? Discouraging people to use Facebook, and also make some money on the side.
(this is a joke obviously, but boy that would be fun and against the T&C)
Rebelgecko 2 hours ago [-]
Other adblock tools have gone the route of allowing "good" ads through and only blocking "bad" ads. Of course the definition of good vs bad might depend on who sponsors the dev.
tonyhart7 31 minutes ago [-]
I know this is gonna be unpopular take
but for modern social media to function, they need showing ads to pay creator
many people livelihood depends on it, creator make content in turn of revenue sharing that user get for free
kakacik 4 minutes ago [-]
AFAIK creators these days earn via additional channels like merch, tiktok etc. Direct views of some videos aren't prime for quite some time.
People dont have issue with creators getting paid, they have issue with absolutely evil platforms that host that and scoop up most of the value between creators and consumers. Platforms that willingly promote ie racist content because it simply drives more views/clicks.
zeafoamrun 2 hours ago [-]
I misread the domain as "digital cesspools" and that is indeed what Facebook is. If you're still on there you're going to get subjected to their abusive practices.
OhMeadhbh 3 hours ago [-]
Oh! The Irony! This page doesn't load when your ad blocker is turned on.
Pooge 32 minutes ago [-]
Are you not using uBlock Origin?
OhMeadhbh 3 hours ago [-]
Apropos of nothing, I noted @markoff said they liked John Markoff in the 80s. As a complete aside, may I recommend to readers Markoff's book "What the Dormouse Said." From 2005, it's a deep-dive into the relationship between 60s counter-culture and 70s / 80s era microcomputer movers and shakers. Want to read about Doug Engelbart tripping balls in the Santa Cruz Mountains? It's in there. Or maybe I just made that up in a LSD fueled trip to the center of my mind. But that KIND of thing is in there. Abbie Hoffman somehow influenced Steve Jobs fascination with PARC derived WIMP systems. An image of Richard Nixon getting his face punched was burned into the original PC BIOS ROMs. Tim O'Leary developed software in the 80s. One of these is not true, but you have to read the book to find out which.
It's like a door to door sales person thinking that if only they could find a way to unlock my door I would buy their stuff.
The second part of putting so much effort into getting past ad blockers is tracking & fingerprinting, especially across devices.
In general, ads work by anchoring a brand name in your memory for when you eventually are looking for said product or service, the goal isn't always to force a conversion on the spot.
We need to prod our representatives to ban the selling of our private information. Websites themselves can use the information but they're prohibited from selling it to anyone else. Why? Because the data changes hands and borders several times after which we lose all control over it.
There’s a delicate balance, more impressions isn’t always a good outcome. Id assume here given the battle against ad blockers that the platforms do believe the aggregate impression mix leads to good performance for advertisers though
Its quichotesque effort but the only thing that can move the needle a bit since everybody involved cares only about money here - waiting for some toothless legislation is useless when harm is happening now.
More discussion here
https://reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1vgcjg5
https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1vgcjg5/
Archived comments / VPN: https://photon-reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1vgcjg5/
The only thing I'm proposing is to do the filtering on graphical data (what the user actually sees) rather than on the DOM (which can be obfuscated; and which may change every week).
Elroy: “I got a job through LinkedIn.”
Annie: “What? That’s crazy! People use LinkedIn?”
Elroy: “No, LinkedIn hired me to help figure out why people don’t use it.”
I think it’s purely to massage their Active Monthly User numbers to show growth.
I don't think so. They want you to use the App because through the they have way more ways to track you.
not shitter, google but fb. some local business don't even have their own sites but maintain an insta / fb page.
"I find ways to defeat adblockers"
(this is a joke obviously, but boy that would be fun and against the T&C)
but for modern social media to function, they need showing ads to pay creator
many people livelihood depends on it, creator make content in turn of revenue sharing that user get for free
People dont have issue with creators getting paid, they have issue with absolutely evil platforms that host that and scoop up most of the value between creators and consumers. Platforms that willingly promote ie racist content because it simply drives more views/clicks.
https://search.worldcat.org/title/57068812