It is possible to see something close (how close I don't know) by saturating the S & M cones instead of avoiding them. Wikipedia refers to these as 'chimerical colors':
In ~2016 on the chan someone posted a completely unhinged post about this "bleen" "grue" color that nobody could see. it's probably lost to the ages now, but I remember it.
EvanAnderson 2 hours ago [-]
These demos really drive home the chemical / biological part of visual perception to me. As I perceive these strange new colors I can almost feel the chemical processes occurring in my cones.
MisterTea 10 hours ago [-]
The fun part is the big red dot on the green background animation. Even before clicking it, as my eyes dart across it, small dark blue/black electric arc like shapes manifest all around the edges of the circle either reaching to the edge of the square or curving back to the circle like solar flares. I am red-green colorblind too.
formerly_proven 10 hours ago [-]
This is heroin for the eyes. Once the hit is over you want to take another one and if you don't it'll take ten minutes or so until the "real" world won't feel like a bleached sepia picture any more.
deIeted 7 minutes ago [-]
tbf it's more like methylamine + P2P meth for the eyes
eru 3 hours ago [-]
I saw the blue rim, but I didn't notice much effect on how the real world looked like after. But then, I'm red-green colourblind.
reoKaneshiro 11 hours ago [-]
Wow, mind /eye blowing! Very insightful, thank you!
rashkov 13 hours ago [-]
wow, highly recommended
toxik 14 hours ago [-]
This was very interesting, thank you for the link.
pwillia7 11 hours ago [-]
incredible
antics 10 hours ago [-]
If you are interested in "imaginary" colors, the gamut is actually well-specified, and (I hope it is appropriate to comment) that I made a visualization where you can drag a selection thumb over the gamut to see the "simulated" version of that color. Also include it is a 12-step contrast-sensitive color palette generator for said imaginary colors, which would allow you to make websites and (say) vscode themes using entirely imaginary colors! https://docs.moment.dev/d/hausdorff/2zmqjlmldchela29xvbzlbki...
In my headcanon octarine is a colour between orange and deep purple. Sometimes it has a hazy blackish halo.
riffraff 10 hours ago [-]
I think it's described as a "greenish purple" in some of the books.
indrora 15 hours ago [-]
I've always taken it to be that the color is unique to the situation/viewer -- a sort of pearlescent void-color that can't be described in any known language, but which just Is. More a physical phenomenon than an actual color, but distinctly hued somehow.
They also make the orangiest orange paint, the yellowest yellow, the pinkest pink, etc. At a certain point I have to wonder how much these are accurate descriptors of the paint colors vs arbitrary made up marketing nonsense.
jhiesey 13 hours ago [-]
Note that there has been controversy for the last few years around Culture Hustle not fulfilling orders and doing other sketchy things. Just a heads up.
rebeccajae 9 hours ago [-]
I had ordered something from them and it took me initiating a chargeback for them to ship anything at all. The product that arrived was of terrible quality, and
their customer support email is completely useless as well, any email gets a canned "your email is very important to us!" style response. My bank denied my second chargeback request because they had technically shipped something.
22039dj9j3d 10 hours ago [-]
There is no "olo-colored" anything; that's the whole point. This is bordering on a scam.
Reminds me a bit of a Greg Egan story from Instantiation called Seventh Sight. Kids with artificial eyes hack them to see colors and spectrum not perceptible by humans.
pixelatedindex 11 hours ago [-]
I wonder why if this is the reason for the icon color of the game Olo. The left half of the icon background looks so similar.
> Olo was discovered on April 18, 2025 by scientists at UC Berkeley.[1][3] The color is named after its theoretical LMS color space coordinates (0, 1, 0), which spells "olo" in leet speak.[4][3]
I presume "loo" and "ool" are in-gamut? What hex values?
amoshebb 3 hours ago [-]
703 nm laser is almost “loo”, and 417 nm is almost “ool”. Searching those wavelengths gives me #FF0000 and #6400FF. Loo is all red and ool is all violet.
xpct 5 hours ago [-]
Since colors are an activation of rods and cones, could we simulate them by stimulating the eye nerves directly? Not necessarily to see new colors, but to replicate the experience of sight? If we managed that, wouldn't it feel exactly the same as seeing something in nature that itches the back of the eye so nicely? I suppose this is entering the brain interface territory.
agiacalone 3 hours ago [-]
So weird. #00FFCC has been my terminal font color for nearly two decades now. Love the color and had no idea about the ‘imaginary’ color Olo.
purplethreads 10 hours ago [-]
> The color is named after its theoretical LMS color space coordinates (0, 1, 0), which spells "olo" in leet speak.
:)
Hm, so is it correct to also call it ultragreen? In the same way that ultraviolet is the same effect but for short waves?
In this regard, it can’t be that novel of a discovery.
riffraff 10 hours ago [-]
Ultraviolet is prnamed that because of the Latin meaning of ultra as "beyond", as it's "beyond violet" in the spectrum, same as infrared is "below red".
Having read this comment from today detailing variance in the default Windows 95 background (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49329282), I'm imagining Olo would be your wallpaper if "257 colors" could be supported.
> It’s not that people in the past couldn’t see blue. Indeed, there were several words which could refer to things we would call blue today, but these words could also describe things we’d assign to other colours too, especially grey and green.
7 hours ago [-]
dylan604 13 hours ago [-]
"They then used lasers to deliver tiny doses of light"
I didn't know there was funding for this
tantalor 13 hours ago [-]
> Funding: This work was supported by a Hellman Fellowship (R.N.), FHL Vive Center Seed Grant (R.N.), Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant FA9550-20-1-0195 (J.F., C.W., W.S.T., A.R., and R.N.), Air Force Office of Scientific Research grant FA9550-21-1-0230 (J.F., H.K.D., C.W., A.E.B., S.R.H., V.P.P., W.S.T., R.S., A.R., and R.N.), National Institutes of Health grant R01EY023591 (A.E.B., B.P.S., P.T., J.E.V., W.S.T., A.R., and R.N.), National Institutes of Health grant R01EY029710 (V.P.P. and R.S.), National Institutes of Health grant U01EY032055 (V.P.P., R.S., and A.R.), and a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface (R.S.).
I wonder how long it will take until this is some kind of an amusement park thing or whatever.
iridescentform 3 hours ago [-]
Same thing as “ultragreen” (as in ultraviolet)
amelius 10 hours ago [-]
We know so much about color, but we're in the dark ages when it comes to odor.
redthorn 2 hours ago [-]
Mix with yellow to get new color Yolo
This color does not give a fuck, I use it in my main CTA. People click it like 4000% more
15 hours ago [-]
timonoko 2 hours ago [-]
Now I remembered how you see this color. You stare the some shape of 0xFF0030 and then close yores eyes and the inverted color appears.
goosethe 15 hours ago [-]
how bout Grorange
cat-whisperer 9 hours ago [-]
is zoox olo colored?
pixel_popping 13 hours ago [-]
Time for a trip then.
dorianmariecom 15 hours ago [-]
lol
trembolram 14 hours ago [-]
lol is the complementary color of olo in the theoretical lms color space.
kridsdale1 12 hours ago [-]
I guess it’s #FF0033 or so.
ihaveajob 14 hours ago [-]
No, that's a different color.
timonoko 14 hours ago [-]
...
SamBam 14 hours ago [-]
You can't have discovered this same color, solve it requires specialized equipment to see it.
The color in the Wikipedia article is just a rough approximation.
timonoko 13 hours ago [-]
I know that. In pure form that color it is both yellow and blue without being green. You sometimes see it in sunsets.
SamBam 13 hours ago [-]
No, because that's not understanding what this technology, and our cone cells, are doing.
For example, yellow has a wavelength of ~580nm. When that wavelength enters our eyes it activates both the M and the L cone cells, with the L slightly more. That differential activation between the two types of cells gives us the experience of yellow.
Blue actually activates all our cone cells, with S the most and a tiny bit of M and L.
What this technology does is selectively activate only the M cone cells.
There is no possible wavelength that activates only the M cone cells, because the combined activation spectrum of the S and L
cone cells overlaps the entirely of the M spectrum. There's nothing natural that can enter our eyes and activate M without also activating L and/or S.
Therefore no one can ever have had the experience of having only their M cone cells activated with anything in the natural world. It can only have been done with this technology.
As for the experience of seeing olo, the qualia, that's almost arbitrary. The authors originally thought it was going to be the "greenest green" but it wasn't really. It wasn't possible to predict what the qualia would be, because the brain has never had that experience. For all they knew they might not have seen anything, because the brain could have just thrown up it's hands at this nonsense signal. Instead they happened to experience this teal-like color. But that wasn't a priori obvious. It's just the brain struggling to apply an experience to nonsense.
It is similar to tiring out the S and L cone cells and then looking away as you say elsewhere -- the authors mention that in the long-form article in The New Yorker -- but this is much clearer and more saturated.
timonoko 13 hours ago [-]
---
timonoko 13 hours ago [-]
Goddammit. Now I remembered how you see this color. You stare the some shape of 0xFF0030 and then close yores eyes and the inverted color appears.
reaperducer 12 hours ago [-]
You stare the some shape of 0xFF0030 and then close yores eyes and the inverted color appears.
So, the cover of R.E.M.'s 1988 record titled Green, which is actually orange. You're supposed to stare at it, then close your eyes, and you see the album cover as it's intended to be viewed.
Can I get note in Wikipedia for inventing this 40 years ago?
gste 14 hours ago [-]
> Only the five subjects of the Berkeley experiment have officially seen olo.
Basically equivalent to
source: trust me bro
orthoxerox 13 hours ago [-]
There's a link to Dynomight's webpage in another comment thread. I've seen olo myself with it. It's to cyan what ultramarine is to sRGB blue.
IAmBroom 14 hours ago [-]
The word "officially" is the massive wiggle-word here.
Only one person on Earth has officially seen the color of my coffee mug. Send me Venmo for $10, and I'll officiate your viewing of the attached JPG....
SamBam 14 hours ago [-]
Except that this requires extremely specialized equipment to individually trigger specific cone cells in your eyes, so I expect they have a pretty damn good idea of who has seen this and who hasn't.
moralestapia 13 hours ago [-]
So, source: trust me bro.
soupspaces 9 hours ago [-]
I'd heard of weasel words but now that you mention it they do tend to be rather wiggly
Rendered at 07:28:21 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_color#Chimerical_co...
https://www.skytopia.com/project/illusion/ipage-et.html
In ~2016 on the chan someone posted a completely unhinged post about this "bleen" "grue" color that nobody could see. it's probably lost to the ages now, but I remember it.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/octarine
Note that those are possibly photosensitive epilepsy risks if you turn them up to 60/100.
I suspect many animals experience color quite differently, including seeing infrared/ultraviolet, etc.
https://www.reddit.com/r/FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR/comments/1dxlt6...
https://kagi.com/images?q=e5+h5+shinkansen&r=au&sh=fWcD0dVpC...
https://www.eurogamer.net/olo-review
I presume "loo" and "ool" are in-gamut? What hex values?
:)
Hm, so is it correct to also call it ultragreen? In the same way that ultraviolet is the same effect but for short waves?
In this regard, it can’t be that novel of a discovery.
This would be "sideways green" perhaps :)
https://youtu.be/wh4aWZRtTwU
> It’s not that people in the past couldn’t see blue. Indeed, there were several words which could refer to things we would call blue today, but these words could also describe things we’d assign to other colours too, especially grey and green.
I didn't know there was funding for this
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12007580/
This color does not give a fuck, I use it in my main CTA. People click it like 4000% more
The color in the Wikipedia article is just a rough approximation.
For example, yellow has a wavelength of ~580nm. When that wavelength enters our eyes it activates both the M and the L cone cells, with the L slightly more. That differential activation between the two types of cells gives us the experience of yellow.
Blue actually activates all our cone cells, with S the most and a tiny bit of M and L.
What this technology does is selectively activate only the M cone cells.
There is no possible wavelength that activates only the M cone cells, because the combined activation spectrum of the S and L cone cells overlaps the entirely of the M spectrum. There's nothing natural that can enter our eyes and activate M without also activating L and/or S.
Therefore no one can ever have had the experience of having only their M cone cells activated with anything in the natural world. It can only have been done with this technology.
As for the experience of seeing olo, the qualia, that's almost arbitrary. The authors originally thought it was going to be the "greenest green" but it wasn't really. It wasn't possible to predict what the qualia would be, because the brain has never had that experience. For all they knew they might not have seen anything, because the brain could have just thrown up it's hands at this nonsense signal. Instead they happened to experience this teal-like color. But that wasn't a priori obvious. It's just the brain struggling to apply an experience to nonsense.
It is similar to tiring out the S and L cone cells and then looking away as you say elsewhere -- the authors mention that in the long-form article in The New Yorker -- but this is much clearer and more saturated.
So, the cover of R.E.M.'s 1988 record titled Green, which is actually orange. You're supposed to stare at it, then close your eyes, and you see the album cover as it's intended to be viewed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_(R.E.M._album)
Basically equivalent to
source: trust me bro
Only one person on Earth has officially seen the color of my coffee mug. Send me Venmo for $10, and I'll officiate your viewing of the attached JPG....