> I’m going to add a recommendation in our docs for pgtestdb, particularly for users aiming to test end-to-end (i.e. job inserted by client → fully completed by worker).
The starter skeleton was LLM-generated and not quite perfect, but discovering the coding agent's mistakes was satisfying in its own right.
peterldowns 5 hours ago [-]
Just want to say thank you to Brandur for doing such a cool experiment. Last year I actually explored the River test suite to understand how they made it work so quickly — he's understating it when he says their implementation is "gold standard."
I'm both surprised and excited to hear that pgtestdb, out of the box, can give anyone a ~nearly as fast experience.
Going to have to throw some tokens at pooling... very interesting idea.
Thank you, Brandur!
Rendered at 21:47:33 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
That's exactly what I did to learn River — implementing simple apps and testing their execution with pgtestdb: https://github.com/lukasschwab/river-playground
The starter skeleton was LLM-generated and not quite perfect, but discovering the coding agent's mistakes was satisfying in its own right.
I'm both surprised and excited to hear that pgtestdb, out of the box, can give anyone a ~nearly as fast experience.
Going to have to throw some tokens at pooling... very interesting idea.
Thank you, Brandur!