NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
The Victorian War on Rabies (historytoday.com)
retrac 44 minutes ago [-]
We're in a prolonged guerilla conflict in Canada. We are winning but the end is not in sight yet.

In Ontario every year the Ministry of Forestry distributes several million doses of rabies vaccine for wildlife. The goal is to immunize the majority of skunks, foxes, raccoons and the like, particularly in populated areas.

They air drop edible pellets with the live rabies vaccine; they are labeled "do not touch do not eat" because it can vaccinate most susceptible mammals, including humans.

never_inline 40 minutes ago [-]
Maybe I am stupid to have to ask this, but what's the problem if a human gets vaccinated by accident?
pfdietz 32 minutes ago [-]
The live adenovirus (engineered to express a rabies protein) is not entirely safe. It won't give you rabies, but it does infect you. For wild animals, it's ok if some small fraction die from it.

They should spread some of these around my town in central NY; we've had rabid animals recently (cat and fox).

datakan 33 minutes ago [-]
The pellets can cause localized infections or rashes to humans. More dangerous to certain groups like small children, pregnant women and people with immune system issues.
datakan 2 hours ago [-]
Strange article. So much focus on dogs with only one mention of bats who are the primary carrier and spreader of rabies.
cryzinger 17 minutes ago [-]
Dogs were the #1 way for humans to catch rabies for most of human history, which I didn't realize until I read Rabid: A Cultural History of the World's Most Diabolical Virus.
Hikikomori 2 hours ago [-]
The first recorded rabies from a bat was in 2002 so not that surprising that it wasn't a focus on victorian England.
datakan 1 hours ago [-]
The Vampire Bat Link (1911): The very first connection between bats and rabies was made by scientist Antonio Carini in Brazil. He discovered the virus in cattle that had died from a paralyzing sickness after being bitten by vampire bats.

The First Confirmed Bat (1921): Researchers Haupt and Rehaag officially confirmed rabies in a bat captured by a farmer. The farmer witnessed the bat biting a calf.

The United States Discovery (1953): Rabies virus infection in insect-eating (insectivorous) bats was first recognized in the United States in 1953.

You make a good point but your year is off. For the purposes of the article though it should have been more evident. Other animals tend to get it from bats because bats are the primary carriers. They didn't understand that back then but we do now and it's worth talking about.

nephihaha 1 hours ago [-]
Dogs were seen as the main vector right into the 1980s. Rightly so. A dog is more likely to attack you than a bat.
datakan 44 minutes ago [-]
But dogs typically get it from the bat. I don't understand the logic
Tade0 32 minutes ago [-]
Bats carry, but don't develop rabies so they don't usually attack dogs on their own - except for self defense, when they're attacked by a dog.

Rabid dogs are typically aggressive and spread the infection on their own.

datakan 9 minutes ago [-]
That wasnt my point. Bats are known incubators for rabies because they are immune to it but still carry it. Dogs find the dead bats and get infected, just like other animals. They see food, they eat it, they get infected. The root cause here is the bats but everyones hyper focused on the dogs for some reason.
nephihaha 4 minutes ago [-]
Dogs are a lot easier to catch than bats and bats don't belong to anyone, so there's two more reasons for you.

There have been very few cases of rabid bats in the UK, if any.

nephihaha 6 minutes ago [-]
I've been bitten or attacked by dogs multiple times. Can't say the same about bats. Maybe vampire bats but I have never visited their range.
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 18:27:05 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.