lot of the photo editors on mobiles have this, maybe even some apps?
delis-thumbs-7e 1 hours ago [-]
This is the useful AI stuf. There’s so many usecases this makes possible.
doctorpangloss 52 minutes ago [-]
how many times have you edited a photo you took on your phone in the last 7 days?
stusmall 35 minutes ago [-]
I think 3? I feel like that's often enough. Sometimes it's nice to do a quick dumb ass gag on a whim. If I am anything I am a man who loves a dumb ass gag.
TeMPOraL 10 minutes ago [-]
Half a dozen at least.
(I'm counting only times I used generative editing options in my Galaxy phone - if I were to take your question literally, it would be "at least once every other day", simply due to rotating and cropping.)
dogomatic 44 minutes ago [-]
Personally, about 9 times. Would be higher if it was even easier and cheaper
NooneAtAll3 3 hours ago [-]
I don't understand. Is it available somewhere to try or is it just an ad?
Nitpick: in the showcase on that page, under Comparison of Natural Scenes, Moebius should definitely get a "structural confusion" tag for the back of the surfboard. If other models get deducted for truncating the surfboard, then surely the elongation that Moebius does should count too.
Also, what's going on behind the in-painted corner of the house? We'd need to see higher resolution pictures, but I'm not convinced that it too shouldn't get a flag. Likewise with the beach just behind the surfboard. Not terrible, but what gets flagged in the competitors is similar.
rasz 28 minutes ago [-]
It sure has a thing for chins, jaws and removing weight, looksmaxing build in.
teroshan 3 hours ago [-]
Unrelated but when I read inpainting and Moebius I was scared it was related and using the art of the great Jean Giraud [0] a.k.a. Moebius
Scared for the same reason I found last year's 'Ghibli filter' craze upsetting, I would have personally hated to have seen this artist's legacy used for promoting AI image generation.
TeMPOraL 1 hours ago [-]
In case that happened then the rest of the world would probably appreciate the art, and a subset of it, the artist (and even a small subset of ~whole Internet-connected population is a lot of people). Some silver lining, perhaps.
solid_fuel 50 minutes ago [-]
> In case that happened then the rest of the world would probably appreciate the art
What art?
We’re talking about generated pictures, aka slop, not art made by a real human.
And I don’t know if you’ve been paying attention but people seem to be pretty tired of the slop. I don’t think it would be appreciated nearly as much as you think.
TeMPOraL 45 minutes ago [-]
This definition of "slop" doesn't cut reality just quite at the joints.
People are tired of marketing. AI generated slop people are annoyed with, is garbage produced for marketing reasons, and it's distinctly noticeable precisely because all the bottom-feeder marketing houses switched to using it. But it's not the AI itself that's the problem here. Slop was here before, but it was made with cheap protein-based image generators. Silicon-based generators are just cheaper.
N_Lens 3 hours ago [-]
The gallery of their samples is pretty impressive!
epolanski 3 hours ago [-]
What is the current SOTA for impainting?
I have a potential project for my e-commerce where I want to allow users to upload images of their house exteriors and impaint awnings.
TeMPOraL 1 hours ago [-]
Awnings, if I understand correctly (I just learned this word right now), are purely additive attachments to structure exteriors - so perhaps they wouldn't necessarily need a full inpainting model? Wouldn't it be enough to estimate an affine transform for a quad and blend the image of awning directly (and the same with shadow map to fake shade)? Is classical photogrammetry up to such task these days?
jdiff 33 minutes ago [-]
I'm quite perplexed by this comment. If I'm understanding you correctly, sure, what you describe is possible through significantly more effort, orchestration, and source photos. Or we can grab one still image and throw an inpainting model at it.
vunderba 2 hours ago [-]
Proprietary? Either gpt-image-2 or NB2.
I have an example of interior decorating inpainting where I replaced a large floor-to-ceiling window with a mirror, and the result was pretty impressive using NB Pro from nearly a year ago.
As far as I know, gpt-image-2 doesn't even let you define a mask unless you've already run it through one iteration, and once you do define the mask, it just ignores it 90% of the time. It's utterly useless for inpainting. Also, this and other proprietary models are severely limited in their output resolution.
I do agree, however, that the Flux2 family is the SoTA at the moment. Running locally via something like Comfy gets incredible results.
vunderba 2 hours ago [-]
[dead]
BoredPositron 1 hours ago [-]
flux klein with LoRa. GPT image and nano often produce high frequency artifacts when editing.
zb3 2 hours ago [-]
1) What are RAM requirements?
2) If these are reasonable, a WebGPU demo would be great..
Rendered at 18:06:17 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
(I'm counting only times I used generative editing options in my Galaxy phone - if I were to take your question literally, it would be "at least once every other day", simply due to rotating and cropping.)
Edit: I think I found it https://huggingface.co/hustvl/Moebius
Also, what's going on behind the in-painted corner of the house? We'd need to see higher resolution pictures, but I'm not convinced that it too shouldn't get a flag. Likewise with the beach just behind the surfboard. Not terrible, but what gets flagged in the competitors is similar.
https://characterdesignreferences.com/artist-of-the-week-3/m...
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Giraud
What art?
We’re talking about generated pictures, aka slop, not art made by a real human.
And I don’t know if you’ve been paying attention but people seem to be pretty tired of the slop. I don’t think it would be appreciated nearly as much as you think.
People are tired of marketing. AI generated slop people are annoyed with, is garbage produced for marketing reasons, and it's distinctly noticeable precisely because all the bottom-feeder marketing houses switched to using it. But it's not the AI itself that's the problem here. Slop was here before, but it was made with cheap protein-based image generators. Silicon-based generators are just cheaper.
I have a potential project for my e-commerce where I want to allow users to upload images of their house exteriors and impaint awnings.
I have an example of interior decorating inpainting where I replaced a large floor-to-ceiling window with a mirror, and the result was pretty impressive using NB Pro from nearly a year ago.
https://imgpb.com/ZXkiXV
Locally hostable? For my money I'd argue Flux.2 Klein but Qwen-Edit still puts in the work.
I do agree, however, that the Flux2 family is the SoTA at the moment. Running locally via something like Comfy gets incredible results.
2) If these are reasonable, a WebGPU demo would be great..