Seems rather stingy - 6 months is barely longer than you will get on a free signup deal for a lot of online products anyway. Kind of worse than nothing if it causes you to adopt work patterns that aren't sustainable for the project after the offer ends.
EduardoBautista 6 hours ago [-]
Which online product gives away 6 months of a $100 per month subscription?
HatchedLake721 6 hours ago [-]
Every 2nd SaaS with a startup plan? I used intercom/customer.io/segment/amplitude/mixpanel for free for a year.
pastel8739 55 minutes ago [-]
The marginal cost of all of those is definitely much lower than for Codex, though
1 hours ago [-]
runlevel1 4 hours ago [-]
The price might be more commoditized if OpenAI kept true to the original mission that lives on, albeit vestigially, in their name.
wodenokoto 6 hours ago [-]
6 email addresses gives you 6 one months trials …
tclancy 5 hours ago [-]
Where am I going to find multiple+email@adress.es?
Groxx 5 hours ago [-]
One can consult the oracle, /dev/random
maybe_pablo 3 hours ago [-]
icloud+ hide my email for $0.99
manquer 4 hours ago [-]
Using a plus sign is subaddressing [1] and most ESPs[2] will route to the main address ( multiple@addre.es) . So you can use use multiple+email@adress.es, multiple+xyz@adress.es and both will route the email to you.
In my experience most SaaS apps do not filter this out and allow re-sign ups with sub-addresses.
Gmail has an additional behavior that dot character is ignored in local component of the address . multiple@gmail.com, mult.iple@gmail.com mult.ip.le@gmail.com all route to the same inbox as well.
I applied for my oss project Filestash which satisfy all their criterias but never heard back despite the project having millions of users, more than 14000 stars on github and representing more work than a single person can cope with
rmast 4 hours ago [-]
I applied for both. Heard back from neither. Mentioned two particular projects when applying, one with 2k stars and 5M monthly downloads, and another with 2M monthly downloads.
matheusmoreira 43 minutes ago [-]
Now I'm wondering what the bar is since even people with millions of users aren't making the cut. I'm orders of magnitude smaller but I signed up too since I had nothing to lose. Didn't get a response, of course.
vldszn 8 hours ago [-]
I applied for the first time a couple of months ago and again this month, but unfortunately I haven’t heard back from them :(
I’m building EasyInvoicePDF - a free and open-source invoice generator. (900+ GitHub stars, 2k monthly users on average, 10k total invoices downloaded)
Isn't the thing open source and governed by its own license?
arjie 9 hours ago [-]
That is interesting. I would have thought they had that right without needing to add it to the ToS.
gruez 3 hours ago [-]
It's better to have something in writing than to possibly have lawyers argue over it in court.
ixtli 6 hours ago [-]
If you only give 6mo then this is the opposite of a commitment to open source it’s a drug dealers tactic of giving the first taste for free.
altmanaltman 2 hours ago [-]
drug dealers should teach MBA classes at this point - so many strategies pioneered by them get used by large tech companies
georgemcbay 3 hours ago [-]
> If you only give 6mo then this is the opposite of a commitment to open source it’s a drug dealers tactic of giving the first taste for free.
Its arguably even more self-serving than the drug dealer tactic because of the feedback loop involved (if you use it to maintain your open source project, OpenAI will surely use that new code [along with all the existing code in your project] to train future models).
So it would be like if the drug dealer gave you the first taste for free and also the drug caused you to shit out more drugs and the drug dealer harvested your shit to sell to both future you plus other people.
ilia-a 9 hours ago [-]
I did fill the form our a while back (it was around for a few months now) without any response. I guess must be really big OSS project for maintainer to qualify.
spooneybarger 9 hours ago [-]
Same. But I got one from Anthropic.
MeetingsBrowser 9 hours ago [-]
What project did you apply for?
ilia-a 9 hours ago [-]
PHP
arcanemachiner 5 hours ago [-]
If you harass the right person on Twitter, you could probably get that ball rolling a little faster.
jstummbillig 9 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
colinsane 8 hours ago [-]
a huge aspect of open source is the user -> contributor -> maintainer pipeline. maybe they mean well, but in fact they're constructing a wall between those last two groups.
especially in larger projects where maintainership duties are heavily delegated, the last thing i want is some tool that can only be used by me, because suddenly i can no longer share the workload that tool targets with people who aren't "technically" maintainers.
28304283409234 8 hours ago [-]
6 whole months?! Gee golly thanks mister!
hnthrow10282910 8 hours ago [-]
Agreed. Seems like it should be indefinite given they created a multi billion dollar company off the backs of these maintainers dedicating their hard earned timed for free to begin with and then trained models against their code.
IMO this is an insult if anything
nish__ 4 hours ago [-]
Especially considering they trained the damn thing on our code.
drw 9 hours ago [-]
Mycli (https://github.com/dbcli/mycli) is a happy recipient of sponsorship from this program. OpenAI asked for nothing in return; not even a link.
mrgoldenbrown 7 hours ago [-]
Are you saying they aren't getting training data from you?
drw 6 hours ago [-]
I'm sure they are getting training data! But it is hands-off otherwise.
We got it yesterday, maybe they just started rolling it out and hence op posted this.
ev3lynx727 3 hours ago [-]
These grant programs feel inconsistent—sometimes they genuinely help OSS, other times they look more like marketing. Hard to tell where the balance really lies.
wseqyrku 3 hours ago [-]
When in doubt, go with marketing. There are things that are 'just marketing' you wouldn't believe.
upghost 8 hours ago [-]
theprimagen called this[1] like three days ago. That was fast.
No, he didn't? He predicted that third parties would donate tokens to FOSS projects, not that the labs would. One is PR that started ages ago, the other is a reasonable prediction of where the world is going.
goodroot 5 hours ago [-]
Not quite donate tokens directly (technically and practically weird), but donation -> compute has been out for a couple months on opub.dev (disclaimer, built it). So his prediction was somewhat correct if not late!
2001zhaozhao 10 hours ago [-]
I think programs like this are cool, the company gets to promote their product and do good at the same time. This looks like a broader program than past ones and giving out GPT5.5 could be meaningful in improving open-source projects' security.
holografix 3 hours ago [-]
Nice way of guaranteeing access to source code as training material and intelligence gathering
monster_truck 10 hours ago [-]
How is this different from https://openai.com/form/codex-open-source-fund/ and are the winners listed anywhere? I've only ever seen devs say it isn't worth bothering, many of which I would've expected to be shoe ins for something like this.
and both of them generally don't work unless you have bought many github stars
winfredJa 9 hours ago [-]
my guess is they get high quality training data.
measurablefunc 9 hours ago [-]
This is correct. The most valuable form of data for any AI company is corrective feedback from real use cases.
vintagedave 2 days ago [-]
I wonder how well this supports niche languages. There's an indication there for stars or other signals of importance to 'the ecosystem'; that could match the Big Libraries but likely not ones for small languages.
vinhnx 7 hours ago [-]
Applied in March when it first launched for VT Code, a Rust-based terminal coding agent, but haven't heard back from OpenAI. The bar seems high, which makes sense given the fund's limited scope and requirements.
htrp 3 hours ago [-]
Anyone know how much API credit openai offers?
tuananh 6 hours ago [-]
a very good way of collecting high quality training data.
i imagine the usage from maintainers of high quality projects are excellent training data. much better than average joe
fuddle 2 hours ago [-]
"6 months of ChatGPT Pro, which includes Codex" - come on, just make it free. Last time I checked OpenAI was worth $852 billion.
purpleidea 3 hours ago [-]
The difference between this one (good) and the Anthropic program (bad) is that openai doesn't force you into a marketing clause while Anthropic does.
I mean seriously, you already ripped off all the worlds open source code. Be more generous and don't demand anything else back. Six months is so little too.
2 days ago [-]
sscaryterry 10 hours ago [-]
Hurdles, more hurdles.
outime 8 hours ago [-]
Codex for open source stored in GitHub*
goodroot 5 hours ago [-]
Trying to get https://opub.dev off the ground to solve this in a more open way.
If you have more than 100 stars, you can get $50 in starter credit.
Ideally organizations, more so than people, provide the bulk of future donations.
As for this program, ehh... Sceptical in general of any frontier program that ends at some time.
Once you're embedded, and all that...
dottchen 7 hours ago [-]
it's hard to trust them when there is little human support behind the scenes
realo 9 hours ago [-]
After what just happened to Anthropic, no way in hell will I ever use, support or give money to Kushner's OpenAI.
The Axios article[1] I read says "calls from Amazon — as well as at least five other companies to a variety of senior administration officials Thursday evening and Friday morning — led to the model being shut down by Friday night".
Yes, Amazon is the only company named, but would anyone be surprised if OpenAI was one of the other five companies? It's hard to imagine a company that would materially benefit more from this event.
The evidence is circumstantial, of course, but can you blame people for making a connection?
On a side note, am I the only one who feels Codex models have a higher general first-pass success rate than Claude models on coding what you want? I use Github Copilot and always find myself drifting more towards them when working.
verdyshd 6 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
ameon 2 hours ago [-]
[dead]
ReptileMan 9 hours ago [-]
The moment a corporation starts to endorse open source is the moment they admit they know that are behind.
SweetSoftPillow 9 hours ago [-]
Anthropic published essentially the same offering recently. By your logic, does that mean they're behind too?
Rendered at 06:07:14 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
In my experience most SaaS apps do not filter this out and allow re-sign ups with sub-addresses.
Gmail has an additional behavior that dot character is ignored in local component of the address . multiple@gmail.com, mult.iple@gmail.com mult.ip.le@gmail.com all route to the same inbox as well.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5233 [2] Less common in work hosted ESPs but almost universally default enabled in public ESPs for consumers.
I’m building EasyInvoicePDF - a free and open-source invoice generator. (900+ GitHub stars, 2k monthly users on average, 10k total invoices downloaded)
https://github.com/VladSez/easy-invoice-pdf
Isn't the thing open source and governed by its own license?
Its arguably even more self-serving than the drug dealer tactic because of the feedback loop involved (if you use it to maintain your open source project, OpenAI will surely use that new code [along with all the existing code in your project] to train future models).
So it would be like if the drug dealer gave you the first taste for free and also the drug caused you to shit out more drugs and the drug dealer harvested your shit to sell to both future you plus other people.
especially in larger projects where maintainership duties are heavily delegated, the last thing i want is some tool that can only be used by me, because suddenly i can no longer share the workload that tool targets with people who aren't "technically" maintainers.
IMO this is an insult if anything
I've forked tensorzero after they archived the repo and will be updating and fixing issues going forward.
https://github.com/agentify-sh/gateway
this is my 2nd attempt
I am using my idle codex usage but would benefit from more inference
We got it yesterday, maybe they just started rolling it out and hence op posted this.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-bT5v5Tm7w&t=164s
i imagine the usage from maintainers of high quality projects are excellent training data. much better than average joe
I mean seriously, you already ripped off all the worlds open source code. Be more generous and don't demand anything else back. Six months is so little too.
If you have more than 100 stars, you can get $50 in starter credit.
Ideally organizations, more so than people, provide the bulk of future donations.
As for this program, ehh... Sceptical in general of any frontier program that ends at some time.
Once you're embedded, and all that...
Correction: only in part
Yes, Amazon is the only company named, but would anyone be surprised if OpenAI was one of the other five companies? It's hard to imagine a company that would materially benefit more from this event.
The evidence is circumstantial, of course, but can you blame people for making a connection?
[1] https://www.axios.com/2026/06/13/anthropic-amazon-white-hous...