Nice article! The generated images make me so nostalgic for the early days of AI image generation. DeepDream and others had such uncanny, interesting generations.
markusMB 3 hours ago [-]
Beautiful illustrations
I find, 'Playing' is just the free and motivated version of 'exploration'.
One thought on your nicely illustrated "key observation [is] that neural networks tend to place features along directions": my guess is that the neural net was TOLD to behave that way by choosing e.g. Cosine Loss?
RealityVoid 2 hours ago [-]
For some reason, the uncanniness of the feature pictures are deeply unsettling for me. It just stirs intense unease. A bit amusing, to be honest.
jcattle 4 hours ago [-]
Very nice visualizations, thanks for that!
One thing I still struggle with in my head is how these vision embeddings can then be used to give LLMs eyes.
Because you somehow need a giant training set which describes images in natural language, no? Is that actually how it works, or is there some smart trick so you don't need to pay labellers a bunch of money to look at pictures and describe them.
dilyevsky 4 hours ago [-]
> Because you somehow need a giant training set which describes images in natural language, no?
That's definitely one way - they train a text encoder together with an image encoder on a labelled set of images. WL & 3b1b made a nice video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv-5mZ_9CPY
jcattle 3 hours ago [-]
Thanks I'll check out that video
cdogukank 44 minutes ago [-]
[flagged]
48 minutes ago [-]
5 hours ago [-]
SkitterKherpi 3 hours ago [-]
[dead]
Rendered at 11:40:27 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
One thought on your nicely illustrated "key observation [is] that neural networks tend to place features along directions": my guess is that the neural net was TOLD to behave that way by choosing e.g. Cosine Loss?
One thing I still struggle with in my head is how these vision embeddings can then be used to give LLMs eyes.
Because you somehow need a giant training set which describes images in natural language, no? Is that actually how it works, or is there some smart trick so you don't need to pay labellers a bunch of money to look at pictures and describe them.
That's definitely one way - they train a text encoder together with an image encoder on a labelled set of images. WL & 3b1b made a nice video on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv-5mZ_9CPY