If your introduction message already includes a bunch of uncurated claims and LLM smells, then what does that say about the code I'm about to run?

Its a bit confusing to claim that "The things your current stack can't give you because it doesn't own the DAG" and use DataBricks as your example: DataBricks includes jobs and pipelines, so it very much owns the DAG, no?

Looks cool, I've been waiting for someone to build this since dbt and SQLMesh acquisition. It would be great to have model versioning and support for ClickHouse SQL.

* * *