Why does this entire article read like chatgpt? Kind of ironic considering the content.
Big llm smells:
'Not "AI helps you autocomplete a function." Not "AI explains a stack trace." I mean the full-on narrative:'
'Sure, it's a weird language. It looks archaic. Sometimes it's hostile. Sometimes it's beautiful.
But still—if you know what you're doing—you can sit down with a keyboard and turn words into:
a product
a workflow
an automated business process
a system that makes money while you sleep
a tool that saves a team thousands of hours
That's real power. It's leverage.'
'Not because we're lazy. Not because we're gatekeeping. Because building real systems is hard, and the number of people who can reliably do it is limited.'
Sometimes I think we get too caught up on what chatgpt will do to the economy, software, and businesses, and forget the most insidious aspect of this type of technology - we will no longer know how to write and all human text communication will confirm to a specific pattern.
armchairhacker 52 seconds ago [-]
Why do "they" (bloggers) want to get rid of writing?
ekjhgkejhgk 4 minutes ago [-]
Who's "we"? I won't stop knowing how to write. If other people do, that's their problem.
Snoozle 1 minutes ago [-]
I meant rather the market for human writing will vanish when 80% or more of the population views LLM text as good communication.
croisillon 3 minutes ago [-]
not one word written by the author, i'd rather read the prompt
ekjhgkejhgk 8 minutes ago [-]
Software engineers are laborers. If you're a capital owner, a laborer is something that weights down your returns.
It's not rocket science.
palmotea 45 seconds ago [-]
> Software engineers are laborers. If you're a capital owner, a laborer is something that weights down your returns.
> It's not rocket science.
It's far above the heads of many supposedly "smart" software engineers, who looked at their high salaries and 401ks confused themselves for capitalists.
rglover 38 minutes ago [-]
Jealousy definitely. They can't do the thing that they depend on for money and AI gives them some feeling of power/an upper-hand. That's why the AI art types immediately started bashing traditional artists as "paint pigs."
abnercoimbre 15 minutes ago [-]
I think it spreads further. I just read two different blog posts from two very different authors lamenting the death of "indie businesses." Another developer in person expressed "concern" for me too. What they all had in common is they're in corporate or SaaS, looking at my indie work from the outside.
Copyrightest 6 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
Cheyana 46 minutes ago [-]
Money.
fithisux 33 minutes ago [-]
They want to replace software engineers because they want exclusive power and because they are not team players.
Narcissism
colesantiago 33 minutes ago [-]
> Part of this is jealousy (yes, I said it)
This feels like cope here.
They want to get rid of SWE because they are highly paid (in the US especially) and they want them for cheap (e.g. Bangalore, London)
AI just makes it a no brainer.
Also I don't think there is anything wrong with everyone being a software engineer, more accessibility to the SWE field for all is great.
Current SWE's will just need to now adapt quicker to remain relevant, and those that can't will just then leave the field.
Perhaps those that don't adapt were probably not good engineers anyway.
Rendered at 18:21:08 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
Big llm smells: 'Not "AI helps you autocomplete a function." Not "AI explains a stack trace." I mean the full-on narrative:'
'Sure, it's a weird language. It looks archaic. Sometimes it's hostile. Sometimes it's beautiful.
But still—if you know what you're doing—you can sit down with a keyboard and turn words into:
a product a workflow an automated business process a system that makes money while you sleep a tool that saves a team thousands of hours That's real power. It's leverage.'
'Not because we're lazy. Not because we're gatekeeping. Because building real systems is hard, and the number of people who can reliably do it is limited.'
Sometimes I think we get too caught up on what chatgpt will do to the economy, software, and businesses, and forget the most insidious aspect of this type of technology - we will no longer know how to write and all human text communication will confirm to a specific pattern.
It's not rocket science.
> It's not rocket science.
It's far above the heads of many supposedly "smart" software engineers, who looked at their high salaries and 401ks confused themselves for capitalists.
Narcissism
This feels like cope here.
They want to get rid of SWE because they are highly paid (in the US especially) and they want them for cheap (e.g. Bangalore, London)
AI just makes it a no brainer.
Also I don't think there is anything wrong with everyone being a software engineer, more accessibility to the SWE field for all is great.
Current SWE's will just need to now adapt quicker to remain relevant, and those that can't will just then leave the field.
Perhaps those that don't adapt were probably not good engineers anyway.