Apparently the LED is on the order of 500 nm. Isn’t that essentially the same size as the actual wavelengths? (Just skimmed the article maybe this is discussed)
zh3 2 hours ago [-]
The light is produced by electrons combining with holes, so the size of the material doesn't come into it (unlike an antenna). I've personally pushed* a single rubidium atom about in a quantum computer and watched it move by emitted light (rubidium atom: ~0.25nm, emitted light 420nm depending on excitation).
* Ok, actually pressed buttons that manipulated the electric field that was trapping the atom and watched the result on a display - lot of physics going on behind the scenes.
amluto 29 minutes ago [-]
Something akin to reciprocity still applies, no? You have a tiny rubidium atom, way too small to couple particularly strongly to the electromagnetic field at visible wavelengths. So it has a low cross-section for absorbing visible light. Won’t it necessarily radiate rather slowly as a result?
I would expect this to be somewhat of a problem with tiny LEDs. In an LED, you inject electrons and holes and you hope that a magical quantum process happens in which an electron and a hole meet, annihilate each other, and emit a photon. But this process is slow, and the electrons and the holes may wander around for a bit before combining. But in a very very small LED, smaller than the mean free path, I’d imagine you might have an issue where the electrons and holes frequently make it all the way across the device without recombining and manage to lose their energy as heat when they hit the opposite electrode. (I have not drawn the diagrams or checked the math here.)
(I took the relevant classes in grad school, but I’ve never done this sort of work academically or professionally, so no promises that I’m right.)
dragontamer 34 minutes ago [-]
It's probably more impressive that the LED was manufactured with light photons. I know it's "normal lithography" problems, but making a 500nm device out of 300nm or 400nm waves of light is downright impressive.
lightedman 2 hours ago [-]
When it comes to solid-state photon emissions, minimum emitted wavelength is not necessarily constrained to size of the structure, but rather the electrical bandgap that needs to be overcome. Electrons are much smaller than any photon, by about 2-3 orders of magnitude, yet it is their being trapped in quantum wells which creates light emissions with wavelengths many times their size.
VerifiedReports 1 hours ago [-]
The question is when mass-produced micro-LED TVs will finally arrive.
asdff 49 minutes ago [-]
The lifeswork of a thousand and one engineers all for the end consumer to not appreciate a difference watching netflix between this and a 1080p backlit panel on a couch with astigmatism.
rowanG077 1 hours ago [-]
They exist but are just extremely expensive.
1 hours ago [-]
Rendered at 22:51:20 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.
* Ok, actually pressed buttons that manipulated the electric field that was trapping the atom and watched the result on a display - lot of physics going on behind the scenes.
I would expect this to be somewhat of a problem with tiny LEDs. In an LED, you inject electrons and holes and you hope that a magical quantum process happens in which an electron and a hole meet, annihilate each other, and emit a photon. But this process is slow, and the electrons and the holes may wander around for a bit before combining. But in a very very small LED, smaller than the mean free path, I’d imagine you might have an issue where the electrons and holes frequently make it all the way across the device without recombining and manage to lose their energy as heat when they hit the opposite electrode. (I have not drawn the diagrams or checked the math here.)
(I took the relevant classes in grad school, but I’ve never done this sort of work academically or professionally, so no promises that I’m right.)