NHacker Next
  • new
  • past
  • show
  • ask
  • show
  • jobs
  • submit
Show HN: ReadyKit – Superfast SaaS Starter with Multi-Tenant Workspaces (readykit.dev)
xet7 5 days ago [-]
Thanks! I really like your new website and rebrand.

Some wishes:

1) First I was confused when I didn't find issues etc, but then I found your rebrand. Please remove your https://github.com/level09/readykit repo, and rename original https://github.com/level09/enferno repo to https://github.com/level09/readykit, so that you keep all issues, PRs, and releases. It also will redirect old enferno url to correct new readykit url.

2) Please make automatic immediate forward from URL https://enferno.io to https://readykit.dev .

3) It would be nice if your website had button for dark mode, so you could switch between light mode and dark mode. Your new website is light, and your previos website is dark.

Thanks!

danpalmer 4 hours ago [-]
Good stack, nice choices.

What always turns me off this sort of thing, and there are loads of these kits, is the tech choices. It's always either very frontend heavy with no answer for deeper backend engineering, or it's all based on MongoDB, or it's a complex mess of Javascript dependencies.

This looks like an excellent set. One could criticise every component, Celery kinda sucks, but would I build a business on it? Yeah sure, many have and they're fine. Flask has its issues, but it will absolutely work. Python is having a renaissance with Astral.

I imagine this would be a highly productive stack to work with. Might even tempt me away from Django for my day-one stack... maybe...

swyx 4 hours ago [-]
(first of all, excellent contribution, starred, will serve as useful starter/reference code, etc)

may i ask incentives? are you doing this out of the kindness of your heart?

Sabr0 2 hours ago [-]
You are completely right in the direction you are headed. I have 2 Saas as well and let me tell you that it's the best thing to offer services and get paid.
isawczuk 5 hours ago [-]
What is your experience running python+flask on production with low latency requirements? Coming from Django, it was always a struggle.
zwnow 3 hours ago [-]
Nice concept, why flask though? Just for iteration speed? Because Python in almost 2026 is probably one of the worst choices for a web server, right after Javascript...

So quick iterations and rebuild once the SaaS has to scale I guess?

wouldbecouldbe 2 hours ago [-]
There are many node/js alternatives, nice to have one for the Python devs
mlnj 3 hours ago [-]
For 99% of the SaaS teams, low latency becomes an issue later unless the product itself needs to be catering with that feature. Focus with kits like this is to get everything running on day 0.
zwnow 1 hours ago [-]
Its not about low latency but memory consumption too. If you have unlimited money to throw at Fly.io or AWS its no issue sure, but other than that you might wanna be mindful with the resources you waste due to using the wrong tool for the problem.

If your app goes viral for some reason and has to scale within hours its not easy to rebuild for performance in that timeframe. Then if u use stuff like AWS and your app has a shit payment model that allows free tier users to just waste resources, good luck paying off that invoice.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact
Rendered at 12:06:46 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Vercel.